🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power grant or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would determine when and where demonstrations can occur, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Earlier administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive attacks on liberty have effectively abolished the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," observed a prominent American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Ministers have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the actions of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for holding placards opposing mass killing and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, suffered and died to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.